William W. Hargrove and Forrest M. Hoffman
Additional information on development of input map layers at http://geobabble.ornl.gov/flux-ecoregions
IA - Abiotic Conditions/Potential Vegetation - Growing and Non-Growing Season | |
10 Zones Small Map Medium Map Large Map Huge Map |
15 Zones Small Map Medium Map Large Map Huge Map |
20 Zones Small Map Medium Map Large Map Huge Map |
25 Zones Small Map Medium Map Large Map Huge Map |
IIIA - Abiotic + Extant Veg. Info + Ecosystem Performance - Growing and Non-Growing Season | |
10 Zones Small Map Medium Map Large Map Huge Map |
15 Zones Small Map Medium Map Large Map Huge Map |
20 Zones Small Map Medium Map Large Map Huge Map |
25 Zones Small Map Medium Map Large Map Huge Map |
All of these represent new analyses
Both IA and IIIA look quite unrealistic at only 10 zones
I greatly prefer the IIIA series (lower set), which contain additional information about extant vegetation and ecosystem performance
20 zones start to look good for IIIA, and 25 zones for IIIA looks great, but both are likely beyond our means
Map generalization using a 13km x 13km mode filter eliminates small speckles and detail, and simplifies the borders, making the map cleaner and easier to see. Thus:
15 Zones Small Map Medium Map Large Map Huge Map |
At these low levels of division, it may be better to overdivide, and then "cluster the clusters" to obtain an already-generalized map. Such a map will have undergone two levels of "averaging," and may consist of more representative zones.
For additional information contact: